|
Humanoid robots or "animates" are capturing the imagination.
It is pure faustian drive that will help them into existence.
Potential economic applications are serving more as an excuse than a
purpose. Animates will be formed in the conceptual mold we have long
developed around animals and humans.
Existing industrial robots are built in narrowly algorithmic style and can
function only in a totally predictable environment with pre-specified goals.
(This is actually their virtue: they make economic sense not as cheap labor
but in terms of precision, speed and reliability.)
Letting autonomously acting physical agents loose on uncontrolled
environments is an enormous challenge. Their behavior must be flexible and
robust, they must be situation-aware to plan their action, they must
establish and recognize sensible goals, perceive the environment, control
the motion of their hands and "legs" to navigate and manipulate, and they
must be physically and energetically fit. All these functions are to be
integrated into one compact, self-reliant system.
Animates will serve as important pacemaker for organic computing. Whereas
AI, or computers in general, live in a formal, encoded universe, always
having human intelligence and perception as mediator to the environment,
animates must cope with the world directly. Therefore "embodiment", the
direct confrontation of a system with the physical world through concrete
hardware, is accepted by the robotics community as both challenging and
creative condition. There is no strong economic incentive to develop
animates, at least for awhile. Correspondingly, they must be developed on
shoe-string budgets in academic and industrial labs. Classical methods of
software development would be too expensive by orders of magnitude. Without
having to fear their competition, organic computing will have space to
expand into. Self-organization, evolution, adaptation and learning will
have to supplant the algorithmic style.
|